Jesus is "a god" — a mighty, divine being — but not Almighty God. The NWT
of John 1:1 reads "the Word was a god," meaning Jesus possesses a godlike
nature as God's chief creation. He is "Mighty God" (Isaiah 9:6) but not
"Almighty God" (Genesis 17:1). Psalm 82:6 and John 10:34 show that others
besides Jehovah can be called "gods" without being the Almighty.
This argument bypasses the Greek grammar debate entirely and works from Old Testament categories. Walk through five steps:
(1) Establish the OT elohim framework. The Hebrew word elohim is used for several kinds of beings — Jehovah himself, loyal divine council members, rebel divine beings, angels, and even spirits of the dead (). The word describes beings who inhabit the spiritual realm. Jehovah is an elohim, but no other elohim is Jehovah.
(2) Show the two categories of non-YHWH elohim by their response to worship. Category A: Loyal elohim who REFUSE worship. In , when John falls to worship an angel, the angel immediately says, "Do not do that! Worship God!" Every faithful created spirit being redirects worship to God. Category B: Rebel elohim who USURPED worship. Psalm 82 describes divine beings — "gods, sons of the Most High" — who are judged precisely because they failed their divine commission. Their punishment: "You will die LIKE men" (). This sentence is meaningless if they were already men. You do not threaten humans with dying "like" humans.
(3) Apply the test to Jesus. If the NWT is correct that Jesus is "a god" — a created elohim — he must fit one of these two categories. But he fits neither. He never once refuses worship (; 28:9; ). And he is not judged for receiving it. Instead, God the Father COMMANDS worship of Jesus: "Let all God's angels worship him" (, quoting LXX — a passage about worshipping YHWH). The only being in the entire Old Testament who legitimately receives commanded worship is YHWH himself.
(4) Deploy the Psalm 82 boomerang. Jehovah's Witnesses use ("I said, 'You are gods'") to argue that being called "god" does not make Jesus YHWH. But look at what Jesus actually says. Psalm 82's elohim are divine beings who failed their commission and were sentenced to "die like men." Jesus' argument is an a fortiori (how much more): "If Scripture called real divine beings 'gods' — beings who were judged for their failure — how much more appropriate is it for ME, the one the Father consecrated and sent into the world?" He is not lowering the bar to include himself among lesser gods. He is raising it: those elohim failed and were condemned; he is the one the Father sanctified. Then in he adds: "The Father is in me, and I am in the Father." He claims to be Lord of the council, not a member of it.
(5) Close the trap. There are only three options: (a) Jesus is a loyal created elohim — but then he should refuse worship like every angel does. (b) Jesus is a rebel elohim — but then God would not command his worship. (c) Jesus is YHWH — the only elohim who rightfully receives worship. The NWT's "a god" rendering forces you into option (a) or (b). Both are impossible. Only (c) accounts for all the evidence.
Every elohim in the Old Testament either refuses worship (loyal angels) or is judged for accepting it (rebel gods of Psalm 82) — except YHWH. Jesus accepts divinely commanded worship. He is either YHWH or a rebel god. There is no third category.
Psalm 82 is about human judges, not divine beings. Jesus was just saying that if Scripture called human judges 'gods,' it's not blasphemy for him to call himself God's Son.
Read carefully: "But you will die LIKE men, and fall like one of the princes." You do not threaten humans with dying "like" humans — that would be meaningless. The punishment presupposes their immortality. confirms this: "Who in the HEAVENS can be compared to the LORD? Who among the sons of God is like the LORD?" No human judges rule from the heavens. These are divine council members — real spiritual beings. Even the Watchtower's own Insight volume acknowledges that elohim can refer to spirit beings.
Proskuneo just means 'obeisance' or 'respect,' not worship. People bowed to kings in the Bible.
Then why does your NWT translate proskuneo as "worship" over 30 times when it refers to Jehovah, but switch to "obeisance" all 14 times it refers to Jesus? Same Greek word, different English translation based on theology, not linguistics. More importantly, in , every creature gives the same praise "to the One sitting on the throne AND to the Lamb." If one is worship, both are worship — same sentence, same recipients, same word.
Jesus is the Mighty God of Isaiah 9:6, but Jehovah is the Almighty God. There's a difference.
The Hebrew phrase El Gibbor ("Mighty God") appears in for the Messiah and in for Jehovah. It is the identical phrase. But more importantly, this argument actually concedes the point: if Jesus is any kind of "god" (El), he falls into the elohim category system. And no elohim besides YHWH legitimately receives commanded worship. Calling Jesus "Mighty God" while denying he is YHWH puts him in the rebel-god category of Psalm 82, whether you intend it or not.
Hebrews 1:6 just means the angels acknowledge Jesus' authority, not that they worship him as God.
quotes from the Septuagint — "Let all God's angels worship him." In the original context of Deuteronomy 32, "him" is YHWH. The author of Hebrews applies a YHWH-worship text directly to Jesus. This is not angels merely "acknowledging authority." The Dead Sea Scrolls (4QDeut) confirm this longer reading existed before Hebrews was written. God commands for Jesus the same worship that Deuteronomy commands for himself.
There are many who are called 'gods' in the Bible — even Satan is called 'the god of this world.' It doesn't make them YHWH.
Exactly — and that proves the point. Satan is a rebel elohim who usurped worship and authority. The "gods of the nations" in Psalm 82 are rebel elohim being judged. Every non-YHWH elohim who receives worship is either refusing it (as loyal angels do) or condemned for accepting it (as rebel gods are). So which is Jesus? He accepts worship without refusing it, and God commands it without condemning it. He does not fit any created-elohim category. He fits only in the YHWH category.
Do not get drawn into Greek grammar debates about John 1:1 — the entire strength of this argument is that it works from OT categories and the Hebrew text, bypassing the anarthrous theos discussion entirely. Also avoid getting bogged down in the full divine council theology; keep the focus tight on the two categories and the worship test. If the JW brings up Greek, pivot: "Let's stay in the Old Testament for now — your own Bible uses the word 'gods' in Psalm 82. Let's talk about what that means."
Read Psalm 82 in full — it's only 8 verses. Then ask yourself: if the "gods" in verse 6 were human judges, why does God say they will "die LIKE men" in verse 7? What kind of being needs to be told they will die like a human? Then read and side by side. The angel refuses worship. Jesus receives it — by God's command. What does that tell you about what kind of being Jesus is?